For over a decade, Blue Bloods has captured the hearts of crime drama fans with its mix of police action, family values, and gripping storylines. But as the show nears its inevitable end, one question looms: How will it all wrap up?
Let’s be honest—some endings would be absolute disasters. If the writers go down certain paths, they could destroy everything that makes Blue Bloods special. So, here are eight things that absolutely CANNOT happen in the Blue Bloods finale.
1. Killing Off Frank Reagan
Frank Reagan (Tom Selleck) is the heart and soul of Blue Bloods. Sure, he’s had his share of close calls, but an ending where Frank dies would devastate fans.
Why? Because Blue Bloods isn’t just about cops—it’s about family. Frank is the glue that holds them together. His wisdom, leadership, and moral compass define the show. Killing him off would feel like a cheap emotional ploy, not a fitting conclusion.
What Should Happen Instead?
Frank should retire gracefully, maybe stepping back while still offering guidance. A final dinner scene with him giving one last Reagan family toast? Now that’s the ending fans deserve.
2. Breaking Up Jamie and Eddie
Jamie Reagan and Eddie Janko’s relationship has been a fan favorite for years. After so much buildup, their marriage was a big moment.
If the show ends with them splitting up, it would feel like a betrayal to fans who invested in their love story. We don’t need unnecessary drama—just let them be happy!
What Should Happen Instead?
Show them thriving, both as a couple and as NYPD officers. Maybe even hint at a new generation of Reagans carrying on the legacy.
3. Danny Reagan Leaving the NYPD
Danny Reagan (Donnie Wahlberg) is the classic, tough-as-nails detective. His relentless pursuit of justice makes him one of the best characters on the show.
An ending where Danny quits the force would be completely out of character. He’s not the type to walk away from the job, no matter how hard it gets.
What Should Happen Instead?
Danny should stay exactly where he belongs—solving cases and honoring his late wife, Linda. If anything, he should get a well-earned promotion.
4. Erin Reagan Losing Her D.A. Campaign
Erin Reagan (Bridget Moynahan) has been building toward a district attorney run for years. If the finale ends with her losing, it would feel like wasted potential.
Her journey has always been about fighting for justice. A loss would be a letdown, not just for her character but for fans who have watched her rise.
What Should Happen Instead?
Give Erin her victory. Let her take office, proving that the Reagan legacy extends beyond the NYPD.
5. A Cliffhanger Ending
Nothing is more frustrating than a series finale that leaves fans hanging. Blue Bloods deserves closure, not an open-ended “what happens next?” moment.
What Should Happen Instead?
A clear, satisfying conclusion that ties up loose ends while honoring the Reagan family legacy.
6. Killing Off a Major Reagan Family Member
We’ve already lost Joe Reagan before the show even started. We don’t need another tragic family death in the finale.
Ending the series with another heartbreaking loss would be a gut punch that fans don’t need.
What Should Happen Instead?
A hopeful, uplifting ending that focuses on family unity, not tragedy.
7. Turning the Reagans Against Each Other
Family dinners are the heart of Blue Bloods. The Reagans may argue, but at the end of the day, they stick together.
If the finale forces them into a major falling-out, it would ruin everything the show stands for.
What Should Happen Instead?
A strong, united Reagan family, proving that no matter what happens, they always have each other.
8. Ignoring Joe Hill’s Future
Joe Hill, the son of the late Joe Reagan, was introduced as a surprise addition to the family. His story still feels unfinished.
If the finale doesn’t give us closure on Joe’s place in the Reagan family, it would feel like a missed opportunity.
What Should Happen Instead?
Joe should fully embrace the Reagan name, finding his place within the family while continuing his career in law enforcement.
Conclusion
Blue Bloods deserves a finale that does justice to its characters, storylines, and legacy. Fans have spent years watching the Reagan family grow, struggle, and triumph. Ending the series the wrong way could ruin everything.
Instead, the finale should focus on family, loyalty, and justice—the core values that have made Blue Bloods so beloved.
If the writers avoid these eight disastrous mistakes, Blue Bloods can go out on a high note, leaving fans satisfied rather than furious.
FAQs
1. Will there be a Blue Bloods spin-off?
There’s no official confirmation, but given the show’s popularity, it wouldn’t be surprising. A spin-off focused on the next Reagan generation could work well.
2. Is Tom Selleck leaving Blue Bloods?
There have been rumors, but nothing confirmed. If the show ends, Selleck’s departure would be inevitable.
3. Why do fans love Blue Bloods so much?
It’s a perfect mix of family values, police drama, and compelling storytelling. The Reagan family dinners are a unique touch that sets it apart.
4. Could Blue Bloods continue without Frank Reagan?
While possible, it wouldn’t feel the same. Frank is the backbone of the show, and his presence is a big reason for its success.
5. When will Blue Bloods officially end?
As of now, no final season has been confirmed. But if the end is near, fans are hoping for a well-crafted conclusion.
