After more than two decades on air, NCIS knows how to craft a great episode. Season 22 recently delivered what could have been one of its strongest installments—until an inexplicable plot hole derailed the story. Fans were left questioning how the writers could overlook such a major inconsistency, turning what should have been a gripping episode into a frustrating watch.
The episode built up an intriguing mystery with all the right elements: suspenseful interrogations, an unexpected twist, and strong performances from the cast. However, as the case unfolded, a crucial detail clashed with established NCIS continuity. Whether it was a character forgetting a key piece of information, a contradiction to previous cases, or a timeline error, this plot hole instantly pulled viewers out of the experience.
What’s most disappointing is that the mistake could have been easily avoided. Longtime NCIS fans are well-versed in the show’s history, and many immediately noticed the contradiction. Social media was flooded with discussions about how the episode could have been one of the best in recent years—if only the writers had paid closer attention to continuity.
While no show is perfect, this misstep highlights a growing issue with NCIS in its later seasons: the risk of prioritizing dramatic twists over narrative consistency. To maintain its credibility, the show needs to respect its own history and ensure that new episodes build on past events rather than rewrite them.
Despite this frustrating blunder, NCIS Season 22 still has plenty of opportunities to deliver great episodes. If the writers take fan feedback into account, they can avoid similar pitfalls in the future. Hopefully, the next major storyline won’t be overshadowed by an unnecessary plot hole that could have been avoided with better attention to detail.
