As fans of Yellowstone eagerly await the return of the series for its final season, Netflix has introduced a new contender in the Western genre: Territory. This fresh series offers a nearly identical premise to Yellowstone, focusing on the Lawson family and their struggles to maintain control over their Australian cattle station. However, Territory dares to explore territory (pun intended) that Yellowstone has only hinted at. Let’s dive into how Territory redefines the archetype of the patriarch and takes risks that Yellowstone never fully embraced.
The Premise: A Struggle for Succession
At its core, Territory revolves around the Lawson family, who have owned their massive cattle station for generations. Much like John Dutton’s family saga in Yellowstone, the Lawsons are grappling with succession issues and the looming question of who will take over the family legacy.
Colin Lawson, played by veteran Western actor Robert Taylor, fills a role similar to that of John Dutton. However, while Yellowstone often portrays Dutton as a flawed but ultimately honorable figure, Territory opts for a different narrative strategy by making Colin Lawson a more detestable character. This shift not only allows the show to explore deeper themes but also sets the stage for a riveting examination of familial dynamics and toxic masculinity.
The Toxic Patriarch: Colin Lawson
Colin Lawson’s character is painted in stark contrasts to John Dutton. In Territory, there’s little to admire about Lawson. The series doesn’t shy away from showcasing his abusive behavior—both verbally and physically—toward his family, particularly his son, Graham. Unlike John Dutton, who often operates in a morally ambiguous gray area, Colin is portrayed as unequivocally awful, making for a gripping viewing experience.
This choice adds a layer of complexity to the storytelling. The audience sees firsthand how Colin’s parenting methods and leadership style have weakened the family legacy. It’s a bold move that flips the script on traditional patriarchal archetypes, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of power dynamics and familial relationships.
The Dichotomy of Heroes and Villains
John Dutton: A Hero or a Villain?
In Yellowstone, John Dutton, played by Kevin Costner, is portrayed as an antihero. While he engages in manipulative and often corrupt behavior, the series attempts to frame him as a noble figure fighting against the encroachment of modernity and capitalism. Dutton is a man of the land, deeply connected to his ranch, but his actions often leave a trail of destruction in their wake.
This tonal inconsistency raises questions about his morality. Is he really the “good guy” in this story, or just another villain with a better PR team? The show flirts with this ambiguity but never fully commits to exploring Dutton’s darker side. This might be why fans continue to root for him, despite his many transgressions.
Colin Lawson: A Detestable Figure
On the other hand, Territory dives headfirst into the idea that Colin Lawson is simply a bad person. The series makes it clear that there are no redeeming qualities in his abusive behavior. This makes for a refreshing contrast to Dutton’s character, as the focus shifts from justifying bad actions to exposing the destructive nature of toxic masculinity.
Colin’s failures as a father and leader are evident. Rather than reflecting on his upbringing or making excuses for his behavior, the show presents him as a cautionary tale about the perils of failing to adapt to changing times. By showcasing Colin’s flaws so prominently, Territory invites viewers to critically engage with the character, reflecting on the implications of his actions rather than sympathizing with them.
The Succession Struggle: A Key Difference
Dutton vs. Lawson: The Heir Apparent
One of the intriguing aspects of both series is how they handle the theme of succession. In Yellowstone, the question of who will inherit the Dutton ranch looms large, with various children vying for their father’s approval. John Dutton has a more traditional role as the patriarch, and while his children have their flaws, the series often depicts him as the ultimate authority figure who must be defended.
In contrast, Territory offers a different take. Colin Lawson has essentially passed the reins to his son, Daniel, yet he still struggles with the transition. This dynamic adds tension and complexity to the story, highlighting the difficulties of relinquishing power. Unlike John Dutton, who remains actively involved in ranch affairs, Colin is portrayed as somewhat out of touch, adding to his character’s detestability.
The Generational Conflict
While Yellowstone often leans into the traditional notion of family loyalty, Territory explores the fractures within the Lawson family. The series highlights the generational conflict that arises when the younger generation tries to break away from toxic patterns established by their parents.
This focus on the heirs makes for a more dynamic storyline, as viewers see how Colin’s toxic leadership has affected his sons differently. While Graham is seen as weak and overlooked, Daniel is thrust into the spotlight, tasked with carrying on a legacy that feels increasingly burdensome.
A Unique Narrative Style
The Realism of Territory
One of the most significant aspects of Territory is its commitment to realism. The show isn’t afraid to tackle difficult themes, such as abuse, generational trauma, and the toxic behaviors that can permeate family dynamics. By shedding light on these issues, Territory aims to resonate with viewers on a deeper level than just the surface-level drama of family feuds.
This approach gives the show an edge over Yellowstone, which often romanticizes the cowboy lifestyle while glossing over the more uncomfortable truths. Territory invites audiences to confront the harsh realities of familial relationships, making it a more grounded and relatable narrative.
A Fresh Take on the Western Genre
By flipping the traditional Western tropes on their head, Territory sets itself apart from Yellowstone. The series bravely ventures into uncomfortable territory that challenges conventional storytelling in the genre. It dares to portray characters as multifaceted beings rather than strictly heroes or villains, adding depth and intrigue.
Building Tension Through Conflict
The conflicts in Territory are not merely external; they stem from the very fabric of the Lawson family’s relationships. By showcasing the deep-seated issues between Colin and his sons, the series builds tension that makes for compelling storytelling. Viewers are left wondering not just how the family will navigate external threats, but also how they will overcome the toxic patterns that have plagued them for generations.
Conclusion: Territory’s Bold Risk-Taking
As Yellowstone prepares to conclude its epic saga, Territory emerges as a bold new player in the Western genre. By daring to make its patriarch detestable rather than sympathetic, the series invites viewers to examine the complexities of power, leadership, and familial relationships in a way that Yellowstone has yet to explore fully.
While both shows tackle similar themes of legacy and succession, Territory distinguishes itself by committing to realism and confronting the uncomfortable truths of toxic masculinity. It’s a risk that pays off, offering a fresh and thought-provoking narrative that captivates and challenges audiences.
