How Three’s Company Unintentionally Perpetuated Racial Stereotypes in the 70s

Introduction

Three’s Company, a sitcom that became a cultural staple in the 1970s and 1980s, is beloved by many for its slapstick humor and outrageous antics. But beneath the surface of this iconic show lies a significant and controversial issue: racial stereotyping. Though Three’s Company was groundbreaking in its own right, particularly with its unconventional setup of a man living with two women, it also unintentionally perpetuated harmful racial stereotypes that reflected societal attitudes of its time.

In this article, we will delve into how Three’s Company engaged with race, its impact on public perception, and how some of its portrayals remain problematic today. We’ll examine key instances where racial stereotyping occurred, the implications it had on the show’s audience, and the broader cultural impact of these portrayals.


What Was Three’s Company About?

To understand the racial dynamics in Three’s Company, it’s important to first grasp the show’s premise. The show centered around Jack Tripper (played by John Ritter), a man who lives with two female roommates, Janet and Chrissy (played by Joyce DeWitt and Suzanne Somers). To avoid the moral scrutiny of their conservative landlord, Jack pretends to be gay, setting up an endless series of comedic misunderstandings.

While the show was wildly popular for its quirky humor and zany situations, it was also a product of the times—reflecting the attitudes, humor, and limitations of 1970s America. It’s within this context that the show’s handling of racial issues needs to be examined.


Racial Stereotyping in the 1970s TV Landscape

The Cultural Context of the Era

In the 1970s, the United States was undergoing major social changes. The civil rights movement had made significant strides, but racial tension, prejudice, and stereotyping were still widespread. Television, as a reflection of society, often mirrored these attitudes. Shows like Three’s Company used racial stereotypes for comedic effect, which, at the time, was largely accepted by mainstream audiences.

However, as society evolved, so did the expectations for more sensitive portrayals of race and culture in the media. Today, looking back at Three’s Company, we see how some of its humor, especially regarding race, can seem tone-deaf or even harmful.


How Three’s Company Engaged with Race

Characterization of Mr. Roper and Mr. Furley

One of the most prominent characters on Three’s Company was the landlord, Mr. Roper (Norman Fell), and later, Mr. Furley (Don Knotts). Both characters, while comedic, often made racial remarks or displayed behavior that could be considered stereotypical.

While Mr. Roper was the more stereotypical “grumpy old man,” his interactions with the show’s characters sometimes leaned into casual racism. His comments about race were typically delivered as offhand remarks, meant to be humorous, but they reflected broader societal prejudices that were still ingrained in American culture at the time.

Mr. Furley, though more affable, was similarly portrayed with an awkward, bumbling nature that could occasionally veer into uncomfortable racial territory. His behavior was sometimes used as a foil to the other characters, further emphasizing the racial divide, albeit in a comedic light.


The Handling of Minorities in Three’s Company

The Character of Mrs. Roper: Reinforcing Gender and Racial Roles

Mrs. Roper (played by Audra Lindley) was another key character on the show. While she wasn’t directly involved in racial stereotypes, her interactions with the more racially stereotyped characters illustrated how the show handled gender and race together. Her bubbly, over-the-top personality and her interactions with characters of color often leaned into exaggerated comedic roles.


Depictions of Ethnic Minorities: A Product of Its Time?

The Episode with the “Black” Character

One of the most infamous and controversial racial moments in Three’s Company occurred in an episode where a black character, played by a well-known African American actor, was introduced. The character was meant to add comedic conflict but ended up reinforcing racial tropes that were common in TV sitcoms of the time. His presence on the show was not just a source of humor but an uncomfortable reminder of how minorities were often used as props to support the “main” storylines.


Cultural Insensitivity or Innocent Humor?

The Question of Intent and Impact

In the 1970s, racial stereotyping in TV shows was often dismissed as harmless or a sign of the times. However, as we look at Three’s Company from a modern lens, we must ask ourselves: Was this form of humor culturally insensitive, or was it simply a reflection of how things were in an era less conscious of diversity and inclusion?

While the intention of the writers and producers may have been to entertain, the impact of perpetuating negative stereotypes cannot be overlooked. What was once acceptable can now be viewed as a form of casual racism that affected the perceptions of minorities, especially for younger audiences who were absorbing these ideas passively.


Audience Reaction: The Mixed Impact of Stereotyping

How Did Viewers Respond?

At the time, Three’s Company was viewed primarily as a harmless comedy, but audience reactions to its racial content were mixed. Some viewers found the racial humor funny and consistent with the social norms of the day. Others felt uneasy, sensing that the portrayal of minorities and racial issues was too simplistic and perpetuated harmful stereotypes.

The show’s success ultimately masked these issues, but there was a noticeable lack of diversity in its cast and storylines. The few times non-white characters appeared, they were often used in stereotypical roles that reflected society’s limited views of minorities during that era.


The Evolution of Racial Representation in TV After Three’s Company

How TV Changed After the 70s

As society began to push for more inclusivity and accuracy in media representation, shows like Three’s Company were increasingly seen as outdated in their approach to race. The rise of shows in the 80s and beyond, like The Cosby Show or A Different World, represented a shift towards more complex and respectful portrayals of African American life.


The Long-Term Effects of Racial Stereotyping in Three’s Company

Perpetuating Harmful Norms

The depiction of racial minorities in Three’s Company may not have seemed particularly harmful at the time, but over the years, it has been viewed as part of the larger pattern of normalizing racial stereotypes in entertainment. These portrayals reinforced harmful societal attitudes, particularly about African Americans, Latino Americans, and other marginalized groups.

The Legacy of Three’s Company

While Three’s Company continues to be celebrated as a pop culture icon, it’s important to acknowledge its problematic racial portrayals. Recognizing these issues is crucial in understanding how media shapes public perception and how far we’ve come in advocating for more responsible and nuanced portrayals of race and ethnicity.


Conclusion

Three’s Company is an undeniable classic in the history of television, but it also carries with it a legacy of racial stereotyping that we cannot ignore. While the show’s humor was groundbreaking in many ways, its treatment of race reflects a time when casual racism was often overlooked for the sake of comedy. By looking back critically, we can understand how such portrayals contributed to broader societal attitudes and learn from them as we continue to evolve in our understanding of diversity and representation in media.


FAQs

1. Did Three’s Company intentionally promote racial stereotypes?
No, the show wasn’t designed to promote racial stereotypes intentionally. However, the humor often relied on racial and cultural tropes that were acceptable in the 1970s but are viewed as problematic today.

2. How did the portrayal of minorities in Three’s Company affect viewers?
While some viewers enjoyed the humor, others were uncomfortable with the show’s reliance on racial stereotypes, which shaped public perception of minorities in negative or oversimplified ways.

3. Why is Three’s Company considered problematic in terms of race?
The show relied on racial stereotypes, particularly when it came to the portrayal of African American and Latino characters, often reducing them to comedic props rather than fully developed individuals.

4. How has the portrayal of race in TV shows changed since Three’s Company?
TV shows have become more conscious of diversity and representation, with a focus on creating multidimensional characters from various racial backgrounds and addressing issues of racism more thoughtfully.

5. Can Three’s Company still be appreciated today?
While it’s still appreciated for its entertainment value, Three’s Company is now viewed through a critical lens for its racial insensitivity, which serves as a reminder of how far media representation has evolved.

Rate this post